← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19927/2013disposed

Sadanand Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-06Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 19927 of 2013 ====================================================== Sadanand Ram Son Of Sukdeo Ram Resident Of Haldhara Laxmipur, P.S. Kursa Kanta, Distric- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Null Old Secretariate, Patna, District- Patna

2. The Commissioner, Purnea Division, Distt. Purnea

3. The District Magistrate, District- Araria

4. The Additional District Magistrate In-Charge Of Establishment Section, Araria, District- Araria

5. The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Having His Office At New Secretariate, Patna, Distt. Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Nadimul Hasan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr Binay Kr Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the petitioner has been working in the Araria Collectorate as a Peon on daily wages since 1990-1991, his claim for regularization has not been considered.

3 The respondent-State has filed a counter affidavit wherein it is stated that the petitioner's name do not figure in the panels of 1991 and 1999.

Patna High Court CWJC No.19927 of 2013 dt.06-10-2018 2/2 This Court is informed that the process of regularization is ongoing in the district of Araria. The petitioner's claim, therefore, has to be considered by respondent No 3 as per its own merit.

5 In view of the aforesaid situation, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending. 6 The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit the detailed claim before respondent No 3 within a period of four weeks from today. Upon such claim being filed, the same may be considered in accordance with law and pass a reasoned and speaking order within three months thereafter. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 08.10.2018 Transmission Date NA