← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2523/2014withdrawn

Prema Gautam v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-29Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2523 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7589 of 2010 ====================================================== Prem Gautam wife of Dilip Kumar Das r/o Village Sahatha P.S. Bhagwanpur, Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Secretary Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh, Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Department of Primary Education, Mr. R.K. Mahajan, Bihar Patna

3. Sri Vinod Singh Gunziyal, District Magistrate, Vaishali Hajipur

4. Sri Shashi Bhushan Rai the District Education Officer, Vaishali Hajipur

5. Sri Arun Kumar Sharma the District Welfare Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur

6. Sri Somesh Bahadur Mathur The Sub Divisional Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur

7. Sri Narendra Prasad, the Block Development Officer, Bhagwanpur block Vaishali at Hajipur

8. Sri Sant KUmar Singh, the Block Education Extension Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur

9. Sri Arvind Das the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Sahatha Vaishali at Hajipur

10. Sri Raj Kishore Chaubey the Secretary, District Education Appointment Appellate Tribunal Vaishali at Hajipur

11. Sri Satya Narayan Paswan, Mukhiya cum President Sahatha Panchayat Vaishali at Hajipur

12. Sujata Kumai, wife of Gauri Shankar Singh R/o Vill Sahatha P.O. Sahatha P.S. Bhagwanpur Vaishali at Hajipur .... .... Opposite parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Paswan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 29-04-2015 Heard.

The application alleges wilful/deliberate disobedience/disregard of the order dated 13.11.2013 passed in CWJC No. 7589 of 2010.

Patna High Court MJC No.2523 of 2014 (3) dt.29-04-2015 2 / 2 A show cause has been filed enclosing therewith the order of the Tribunal. It appears that in the light of the order of this Court the Tribunal has already disposed of the appeal, copy whereof has been enclosed.

Mr. Paswan, in view of aforesaid, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this contempt application with liberty to approach the concerned authority for enforcement of the order of the Tribunal.

The contempt application is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U