← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35861/2024bail granted

Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Paswan @ Dilip Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-16Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35861 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2024 Thana- MANIYARI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Paswan @ Dilip Kumar Paswan Son Of Shiv Kumar Paswan Resident Of Village - Sonwarsa Saah, P.S. - Maniyari, District - Muzaffarpur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dharmendra Paswan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant with an allegation that 460.44 litres of liquor was recovered a bansbari adjacent to the house of the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35861 of 2024(2) dt.16-05-2024 2/3 recovery is from a place, which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large. It is also submitted that merely because the bansbari is adjacent to the house of the petitioner that in itself is not a ground for implicating someone. It is next submitted that it appears that the police in order to save the real culprit falsely implicated the petitioner taking advantage of his antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise Court No.II, Muzaffarpur in connection with Maniyari P. S. Case No.68 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35861 of 2024(2) dt.16-05-2024 3/3 found that petitioner has antecedent of more than three cases, in that event, the present anticipatory bail application shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T