Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32227/2025bail granted

Jai Chand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-19Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32227 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2002 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== Jai Chand Yadav S/o Sri Naresh Yadav R/o Vill- Pakilpar, P.S.- Bihariganj, Distt- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 333 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. In the present case, the petitioner had been granted privilege of bail on 23.08.2007 vide Bail Petition No.539 of 2007 from the learned Court below. However, his bail bonds were cancelled on 16.01.2020 and, on 30.08.2023, the case of the petitioner along with one another co-accused was separated on the ground of he being a permanent absconder. The petitioner was, thereafter, remanded in the present case on 26.09.2024 and charges were framed in this case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32227 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 2/2

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that it is a case of misuse of bail. However, the petitioner has now remained in custody since 26.09.2024 and charges have also been framed. It is stated that all other coaccused persons are on bail and the petitioner also undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No.10 of 2002.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) Trivedi/- U T