Sunita Devi v. The Patna Municipal Corporation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8527 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Sunita Devi Wife of Suresh Prasad Owner of Flat No. 6 and B - 6, Lakhan Vishwanath Apartment Situated at Ambedkar Path, P.S. Rajiv Nagar, Town and District Patna 2.

Satyam Mittal, Wife of Vinayak Mittal Owner of Flat No. C-6, Lakhan Vishwanath Apartment Situated at Ambedkar Path, P.S. Rajiv Nagar, Town and District Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Patna Municipal Corporation Maurya Lok Complex, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna through Municipal Commissioner. 2.

The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S. Kotwali, District- Patna.

3.

The Vigilance Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S. Kotwali, District- Patna.

4.

The Executive Engineer, Nutan Capital Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna. 5.

Anil Kumar Sinha, Son of not known, flat No. C - 2 Lakhan Vishwanath Apartment Situated at Ambedkar Path, P.S. Rajiv Nagar, Town and DistrictPatna. 6.

Sanjay Kumar, Son of Late Vishwanath Singh resident of Mohalla - Khajpura, P.O. P.V. College, P.S. Gardanibagh, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shambhu Sharan Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prasoon Sinha, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 06-12-2024 In this case on 30.09.2024, two weeks time was granted to the petitioner to take steps for issuance of notices upon Respondents no. 06. Since it was a peremptory order and the said order has not been complied with within the stipulated time of two weeks, the same stood rejected on 17.10.2024 itself.

2. Perused the file.

3. Consigned.

(Rajiv Roy, J) perwez U