Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32952 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Purnia ====================================================== Manish Kumar Son of Shatrughan Yadav Resident of Laheriasarai, PostRamnagar, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Vasudeo Ram, Advocate For the State :
Mr. J.K. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 19-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 07.07.2020 in connection with C1 Case No. 140 of 2020 P.S. Case No. 282 of 2020 for the offences alleged under Section 30(a) of Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 168 litres of foreign liquor from a Mahindra vehicle goods carrier bearing Registration No. BR 01 GD 5270 said to belong to the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32952 of 2020(3) dt.19-01-2021 2/2 It is submitted that the petitioner has already suffered more than six months in custody, and claims clean antecedents.
4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.
5. Be that as it may and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 07.07.2020, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Excise), Purnia, in connection with C1 Case No. 140 of 2020, if he is not otherwise required in any other case.
6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T