Vikram Sao v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66400 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2011 Thana- DEO District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Vikram Sao, Son of Late Kishun Sao, Resident of Village-Madanpur,Durga Chowk,P.S. Madanpur,Distt.-Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Manager Sah, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 457, 324, 307 and 504 of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that at the night of 09.01.2011 accused Vikram Sao (petitioner) barged into house of the informant Raj Ballabh Pandey and gave knife blows to him as well as to his daughter Shalini Kumari with intent to kill them.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66400 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/3 present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Earlier the victim/informant of the present case had instituted a case against this petitioner for an offence under Section 366(A) of the IPC in that case the petitioner was granted bail. Thereafter, the same informant had instituted the present case i.e., Deo P.S. Case No. 1 of 2011 against this petitioner. The victim girl (wife of this petitioner) had instituted a complaint case against the informant of the present case (father of the victim girl) vide Annexure-2 to the present application. The informant is none else but the father-in-law of this petitioner.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad, in connection with Dev P.S. Case No. 01/2011,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66400 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T