Rabindra Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38902 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2023 Thana- NAGARNAUSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Rabindra Kumar Mahto son of Janakdev Mahto Village- Hanuman Gadh PoChandi Ps- Chandi Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Asha Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-07-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner procured appointment on the post of teacher on basis of forged and fabricated certificates.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has not submitted any forged or fabricated certificates and all the documents were duly issued by the Office of the Director, State Council of Education, Research and Training, Assam Kahilapara, Guwahati and without property scrutiny or giving notice to the petitioner, the same have been stated to be forged and this false and concocted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38902 of 2024(4) dt.30-07-2024 2/2 case has been lodged. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that there is specific accusation that this petitioner obtained appointment on the post of teacher on basis of forged and fabricated educational certificates and during investigation it has come that certificates submitted by the petitioner were forged and fabricated.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of accusation and the fact that during course of treatment it has surfaced that education certificates issued by the petitioner were forged and fabricated, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T