← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44550/2021bail granted

Bhogendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-06Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44550 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2017 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

BHOGENDRA SINGH S/o Ramishwar Singh Resident of VillageJhitkahiyan Purvi, P.S.- Vaishali, (O.P. Belar), District- Vaishali. 2.

Suresh Singh Son of Late Mukhlal Singh Resident of Village- Jhitkahiyan Purvi, P.S.- Vaishali, (O.P. Belar), District- Vaishali. 3.

Vinay Kumar S/o Sagar Singh Resident of Village- Jhitkahiyan Purvi, P.S.- Vaishali, (O.P. Belar), District- Vaishali.

4.

Durga Singh S/o Ram Lal Singh Resident of Village- Jhitkahiyan Purvi, P.S.- Vaishali, (O.P. Belar), District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Bipin Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 324, 452, 380, 354, 354(B) and 504 of the IPC and Sections 4, 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act.

As per complaint case, it is alleged that the accused persons misbehaved with the daughter of the informant and also snatched the ornaments and other articles.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44550 of 2021(3) dt.06-04-2022 2/2 that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioners. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ADJ-I, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 299 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T