Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29569/2019bail granted

Md. Anjar @ Raja v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29569 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2017 Thana- SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== MD. ANJAR @ RAJA Son of Md. Mustafa @ Laloo @ Lalu Resident of Village-Bail Mohan, P.S.-Pupri, District-Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR

2. Rahana Khatoon ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ritesh Kumar Narain Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner who is husband of opposite party no. 2 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/-per month, starting from this month, to opposite party no. 2. In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/- per month, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri Sitamarhi in Complaint Case No. C1/113/17, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as on the following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29569 of 2019(5) dt.04-03-2020 2/2

(1) Opposite party no. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the opposite party no. 2.

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

(4) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi U T