Ramdhyan Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1895 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Ramdhyan Yadav , son of Late Lal Mohan Yadav
2. Sushila Devi, wife of Ramdhyan Yadav, Both resident of village + P.S. Brahampur, District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Mr. Vyashjee, The Commissioner, Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna
3. Mr. Anand Kishore, The commissioner, Patna Division, Patna
4. Mr. Brajesh Mehrotra, the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna
5. Mr. Virendra Kumar Mishra, the Joint Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna
6. Mr. Raman Kumar, the Collector, Buxar
7. Mr. Arvind Kumar, the Additional Collector, Revenue, Buxar
8. Mr. Anwarul Haque Siddique, the Additional Collector, Buxar
9. Mr. Pramod Kumar, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Dumraon, Buxar
10. Mr. Ajit Kumar, the Dy. Collector Land Reforms, Dumraon, Buxar
11. Mr. Bhagwan Singh, the Circle Officer, Brahampur, District- Buxar
12. Mr. Ranjeet Singh, Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Brahampur, DistritBuxar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anjani Kumar AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 05-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties, referring to the show cause, particularly para-7 whereof, submits that the order of this Court has been complied with as the land has been settled with the concerned beneficiaries and Parchas have been issued.
Considering the aforesaid, there is no point to proceed any further with this case. In the event, the statements of the
Patna High Court MJC No.1895 of 2016(5) dt.05-02-2019 2/2 opposite parties are found to be incorrect, liberty shall be available to the petitioners to file a petition for revival of the present case.
With the aforesaid, the present application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U