Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31156/2020bail granted

Vijay Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2020-12-09Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31156 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2019 Thana- PATAHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== VIJAY SAHNI, Son of Nagendra Sahni, Resident of Village - Dewapur, P.S. - Patahi, District - East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-12-2020 The matter has been taken up through virtual Court proceeding.

Let the defects be removed within two weeks of the start of the physical Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is that liquor was recovered from the vehicle of the petitioner. Petitioner has stated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent. Petitioner was not there at the time of recovery. Petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2020. Investigation of the case is already complete against the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31156 of 2020(2) dt.09-12-2020 2/2 Considering the facts of the case aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Patahi (Pachpakari) Police Station Case No. 211 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T