Jaikilal Srivastava v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32812 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2021 Thana- SISWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
JAIKILAL SRIVASTAVA S/o Manoj Srivastava Resident of VillageChataiyan Jai Chhapra (Mishra Tola), P.S.- Siswan, Dist- Siwan 2.
Ankit Srivastava S/o Anjay Lal Srivastava Resident of Village- Chataiyan Jai Chhapra (Mishra Tola), P.S.- Siswan, Dist- Siwan 3.
Tinkal Srivastava S/o Rajan Srivastava Resident of Village- Chataiyan Jai Chhapra (Mishra Tola), P.S.- Siswan, Dist- Siwan 4.
Rajat Srivastava S/o Butan Lal Srivastava Resident of Village- Chataiyan Jai Chhapra (Mishra Tola), P.S.- Siswan, Dist- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs.Kumari Anupam For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs.Renuka Ratnakar Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-10-2022 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition, so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned.
Accordingly, in respect of petitioner no. 1, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioners (i.e. petitioner no. 2 to 4) apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 307 & other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per F.I.R., petitioners no. 2 & 3 pushed the informant's brother Basant on the ground and so far as petitioner no. 4 is concerned, there is no specific allegation against him.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32812 of 2022(2) dt.11-10-2022 2/2 It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Anjay Lal Srivastava. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. Petitioners have got clean antecedent. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail petition. Considering the aforesaid facts & circumstances and clean antecedent of petitioners, let the above named petitioners no. 2, 3 and 4, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Siwan in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 297 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T