Amar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31216 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2024 Thana- TARIYANI CHOWK District- Sheohar ====================================================== Amar Kumar S/O Ramchandra Mahto Resident Of Village-Mudadih, P.S.- Kanhauli, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-05-2025 Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No. 210 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of the BNS, 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 12.10.2024, at about 11:00 PM, in the evening, the informant had gone along with his uncle to see worship of Goddess Durga and upon reaching there, he parked his motorcycle adjacent to the hotel of Mukesh Mahto in the Salempur market. It is stated that after parking the same bike, he locked the bike and went away but on his return after about one hour, he found his bike missing and upon inquiry, no trace of same could be found.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31216 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 2/2 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Counsel submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. He also submits that the petitioner was remanded in Sheohar P.S. Case No. 298 of 2024 and in this case, he has given his confessional statement. No recovery has been made from his conscious possession. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 03.03.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No. 210 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T