Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31994 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2024 Thana- KHAJEKALA District- Patna ====================================================== Jyoti Kumari, D/O Shri Krishana Prasad R/O Sadar Gali, P.O.- Jhauganj, P.S.- Khajekala, Patna City, Dist.- Patna, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Abhishek Kumar S/O Sri Moti Lal Verma R/O Vill.- Sugaon, P.S.- Tehta, Dist.- Jehanabad, Bihar, Pin- 804427, at Present Post Section Engg. (Signal) Railway Staff, Vododara Pali, P.S.- Baroda City Junction, Dist.- Baroda, Gujrat.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vishal Vikram Rana, Advocate Ms. Misha Bharti, Advocate Mr. Utkarsh Vikram Rana, Advocate Mr. Akash Priye, Advocate Mr. Kumar Saurav Dev, Advocate Mr. Rishav Kumar Rao, Advocate Mr. Harsh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2026 The present bail petition preferred for cancellation of bail was filed merely on two scores. Firstly, that the petitioner is not attending the court proceedings for two consecutive dates, which was a condition while granting bail to the petitioner through Cr. Misc. No. 75659 of 2025 dated 11.11.2025 and secondly, that crime was again committed against informant, for which a complaint case was lodged which is pending in the Court of A.C.J.M. 1st, Patna City as C.A. Case No. 1452 of 2025 (Annexure-P/4).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31994 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 2/2

2. It would be apposite to reproduce the condition imposed by this Court, while releasing petitioner on bail through Cr. Misc. No. 75659 of 2025 dated 11.11.2025, which reads as under:- "The petitioner shall remain present before the learned trial court on each and every date of hearing, and failure on two consecutive dates of hearing, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner."

3. In view of aforesaid, if petitioner is aggrieved as submitted aforesaid, he may raise all such issues before the learned trial court itself, which may pass appropriate order in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

4. In view of aforesaid, the present petition stands devoid of any merit, accordingly, same stands dismissed. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T