Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32785/2023allowed

Babulal Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-20Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32785 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-598 Year-2022 Thana- NAANPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== BABULAL RAI son of Satyanarayan Rai Village- Patnukka Ps- nanpur DistSitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341,342,379,323, 307, 385, 387, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of assaulting the informant and demanding ransom money from him. It is further alleged that the accused persons looted cash of Rs. 2,000/- from the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. From the perusal of the FIR, it appears that nothing specific have been alleged against the petitioner rather allegations are quite general

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32785 of 2023(4) dt.20-09-2023 2/2 and omnibus one. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submitted that the ransom demand has not been executed. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 20.12.2022.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Naanpur P.S. Case No. 598 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U