← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31669/2026allowed

Arsalan Khan @ Asraslan Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-12Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31669 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-267 Year-2024 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Arsalan Khan @ Asraslan Khan Son of Jahandar Khan Resident of VillageWard No. 10, Sikandarpur, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Parwej Khan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Informant.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.267 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 103(1), 352 & 3(5) of the BNS and under Section 27 of the Arms Act and subsequently added Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 25 of the Arms Act on 02.08.2024.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with others have assaulted the informant and his family members.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that in this case altogether 29 persons

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31669 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 are named in the FIR. It has further been submitted that the nature of allegation against this petitioner is general and omnibus. It has further been submitted that similarly situated coaccused have been granted bail by learned Co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 88297 of 2024, 86778 of 2024 and 5262 of 2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 23.03.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Informant.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Vth, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.267 of 2024. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T