Kumari Rina Bala v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15656 of 2017 ====================================================== Kumari Rina Bala W/o Sri Diwakar Prasad Singh, R/o Village- Aiama, P.OGiddha, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur presently residing at MohallaMaripur, P.S.- Kaxi Mohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur, Wroking as Lecturer, Department of Home Science, Ram Shresth Singh Inter College, Chochaha, Anirudh Belsar Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Secretary, Higher Education, Department of Human Resource Development, Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Director, Secondary Education, Department of Human Resource Development, Bihar, Patna. 4.
The District Education Officer, Bihar, Patna. 5.
Bihar School Examination Board, Patna through it's Secretary. 6.
The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 7.
Ram Shresth Singh Inter College, Chochaha Anirudh Belsar, Muzaffarpur through it's Secretary.
8.
The Secretary, Ram Shresth Singh Inter College, Chochaha Anirudh Belsar, Muzaffarpur.
9.
The Principal, Ram Shresth Singh Inter College, Chochaha Anirudh Belsar, Muzaffarpur.
10.
Smt. Shashi Sinha, W/o Sri Ravi Thakur, R/o Village- Bhushkaul, P.S.- Pusha, District- Samstipur.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Ms. Abhanjali, A.C. to G.A.-12.
For BSEB :
Mr. P.K. Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Gyan Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, leaned counsel for the private respondent as well as learned counsel for the Bihar School Examination Board are present.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15656 of 2017(4) dt.11-12-2025 2/2
2. By previous order dated 13.11.2025, this matter was adjourned by way of last chance making it clear if on the next date, the petitioner is not keen to press the writ application, then this Court may consider it dismissing it for non-prosecution.
3. Today again nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioner, hence the present writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) sanjeev/- U