Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31083 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== Pappu Yadav Son of Chhotelal Yadav Resident of Village- Tirbirwa, P.S.- Gopalganj Town, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Satyendra Kumar Ram Son of Dhurup Ram Resident of Village- Tirbirwa, Post- Bhitbherwa, P.S.- Gopalganj Town, District- Gopalganj ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binay Krishna, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 352 and 3(5) of BNS and Sections 3(1) (r)(s) 3(1)(w) of SC/ST Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with others arrived at the door of the informant and started abusing him with caste name. It is further alleged that the specific allegation against this petitioner is that he has assaulted with iron rod on the head of the informant due to which, he received head injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31083 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the nature of injury of the informant is grievous. Learned counsel has further submitted that there is also a counter version of this case and the petitioner and the informant both are neighbourers. There had been free fight between both the parties and both parties have sustained injuries. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 12.02.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 195 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum Spl. Judge, POCSO, Gopalganj.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- Sneha /- U T