← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31518/2025allowed

Deepraj Kumar @ Deepraj @ Deep Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-15Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31518 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2024 Thana- Ratanpur District- Begusarai ====================================================== Deepraj Kumar @ Deepraj @ Deep Raj Kumar son of Chandramauli Singh @ Chandra Mauli Singh R/O- Cheriya Bariyarpur PS- Cheriya Bariyarpur, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 310(4) (5) of the B.N.S. and Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on secret information, informant along with other police personnel reached the spot and saw that the accused persons were trying to flee away. It is further alleged that four(4) out of five(5) accused persons were nabbed. It is further alleged that on being asked about the fled away person, Sujit Kumar confessed the name of this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31518 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 2/2 connection with the present case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner. It is further submitted that recovery of some arms were made from the persons, who were apprehended on the spot. It is also submitted that co-accused, namely, Subham Kumar, from whose possession on country made pistol was recovered, has been granted by the trial Court itself. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 30.01.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail stating that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Ratanpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Jagdish/- U T