Surendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30333 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2018 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== SURENDRA RAM Son of Mishri Das @ Mishri Ram Resident of VillageMohallah- Pokhraira Khas, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Rajapakar, District- Vaishali at Hajipur (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mamta Kumari Wife of Surendra Ram Daughter of Bhushan Ram, Resident of Village/ Mohallah- Pokhraira, P.S.- Rajapakar, District- Vaishali at Hajipur (Bihar), presently residing at Village- Khas Patedha, P.S.- Sarai, District- Vaishali at Hajipur (Bihar).

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-08-2019 The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rajapakar P. S. Case No. 184 of 2018 registered under Sections 323,341,497,498A and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner, as per FIR, is that informant was married to the petitioner about four years back and after marriage, petitioner started demanding motorcycle from the informant and her family members and due to nonfulfillment of demand made by the petitioner, she was being assaulted physically and mentally and finally she was driven out from her matrimonial home.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30333 of 2019(4) dt.26-08-2019 2/2 files a supplementary affidavit and submits that both parties have amicably settled their dispute and have entered into a compromise by way of joint affidavit which has been filed in the court of learned ACJM-13, Vaishali at Hajipur. No one appears on behalf of the informant.

After having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that parties have settled their dispute amicably which would be evident from Annexure-6 to the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner, accordingly, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. As such provisional anticipatory bail granted vide order dated 01.08.2019 to the petitioner is hereby confirmed and the bail bond furnished by the petitioner in the court below shall be treated to be bond furnished pursuant to this order. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- U T