Bajrangi Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31199 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2025 Thana- Mufassil District- Khagaria ====================================================== Bajrangi Verma S/o Vidhan Verma R/o Village- Chandra Nagar RAnko, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-05-2025 Heard Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 05 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 74, 303(2), 329(4), 352, 351(2) and 3/3(5) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner assaulted Om Prakash Verma with dabiya due to which he received injuries.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31199 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 2/3 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner and informant are neighbour. They are have land dispute. There is also a counter version of this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the allegation is that the petitioner has assaulted with dabiya which is a sharp cutting weapon. The injury report does not correlate with the allegation. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.03.2025.

5. The learned counsel for the State has admitted that accused party has also received injuries and from perusal of the injury report of Om Prakash, it transpires that one of the injury is grievous in nature which is caused by hard and blunt substance.

6. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned counsel for the informant.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31199 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 05 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T