Kumari Baby Rani And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10553 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.
Kumari Baby Rani and Ors Wife of Subodh Choudhary 2.
Nutan Kumari, Wife of Rabindra Prasad Yadav 3.
Rozi Kumari wife of Ashok Kumar Biyogi All Resident of VillageMirzapur, P.S.- Barahat, Dist- Banka, Bihar 4.
Ashok Kumar Choudhary son of Keshav Lal Choudhary Resident of Village- Louni, P.S. Barahat, Dist- Banka, Bihar. 5.
Fulo Harijan Son of ate Gngu Harijan Resident of Village- Jethor Kakria, P.S.- Barahat, Dist- Banka, Bihar 6.
Tarni Prasad Sah, son of Huro Prasad Sah Resident of Village- Dafarpur, P.S.- Barahat, Dist- Banka, Bihar.
7.
Md. Nazir Alam son of Md. Nasim 8.
Md. Israil son of Md. Nasim Both Resident of Village- Chhoti Barhouna, P.S.- Barahat, Dist- Banka, Bihar.
9.
Md. Nizamuddin son of Md. Tahir Resident of Village- Dafarpur, P.S.- Barahat, Dist- Banka, Bihar.
10.
Sikandr Yadav son of Tophi Yadav resident of Village- Nayacha Gorgama, P.S.- Amarpur, District- Banka.
11.
Rekha Devi D/o Kuber Prasad Mishra resident of Village- Phaga Brahman Tola, P.S.- Bounsi, District- Banka.
12.
Kailash Pd. Yadav son of Nawal Kishore Yadav resident of VillageChakmahmadpur, P.S.- Rajoun, District- Banka. 13.
Nutan Kumari W/o Prayag Mndal, Village- Babhangama, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka.
14.
Geeta Devi wife of Sikandar Manjhi Village- Babhangama, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka, Bihar 15.
Dropadi Kumari wife of Sohan Sah Village- Babhangama, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka, Bihar 16.
Sanjay Prasad Yadav son of Late Sita Ram Yadav Village- Bheramor, P.S.- Barahat, Dist- Banka, Bihar.
17.
Jawahar Mandal son of Jagdish Mandal Village- Babhangama, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka, Bihar 18.
Govind Narayan Himansu son of Late Puran Roy, Village- Deghra, P.S.- Barahat, Distt- Banka.
19.
Kapildeo Yadav son of Sargun Yadav, Village- Deghra, P.S.- Barahat, DisttBanka. 20.
Puran Mandal, son of Ramkund Mandal Village- Srinathpur, P.S.- Barahat, Dist- Banka, Bihar.
21.
Sunaina Devi wife of Sachhidanand Yadav, Village- Parwatta, P.S.- Barahat, Dist- Banka, Bihar.
22.
Dhananjay Yadav son of Tejnarayan Yadav Village- Lilabaran, P.S.- Barahat,
Patna High Court CWJC No.10553 of 2016(7) dt.03-04-2019 2/3 Dist- Banka, Bihar 23.
Md. Moeiz, son of Late Sekh Pegam, Village- Lilabaran, P.S.- Barahat, DistBanka, Bihar 24.
Lalita Devi wife of Late Subhash Chandr Mandal Village- Babhangama, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, State of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, State of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Director Mass Education, State of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, State of Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mritunjay Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Madhukar Krishna Sinha- Sc1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 03-04-2019 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the respondent State.
It is submitted by Counsel for the petitioners that the claim raised in the writ petition is covered by the decision in the case of State of Bihar & others vs. Harendra Mishra in LPA No. 1047 of 2017.
In view of such submission the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities to consider claim of the petitioners and if the same is found similarly situated and covered by the judgment in the case of State of Bihar & ors vs. Harendra Mishra, it is needless to say that the petitioner would
Patna High Court CWJC No.10553 of 2016(7) dt.03-04-2019 3/3 be entitled to the same treatment as the petitioners in the said case.
It is submitted by Counsel for the petitioners that in respect of IA Nos. 8510/2016, 9029/2016, 9254/2016 and 8203/2017 he may be permitted to raise the grievance of the petitioners therein in appropriate proceeding. The said prayer of the petitioners is allowed. The I.A. are therefore dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for by the petitioner.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U