← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29597/2019allowed

Ram Pratap Singh @ Majhil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-03Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29597 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2017 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Ram Pratap Singh @ Majhil Singh Son of Ram Bahadur Singh Resident of Village - Nawada, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhavesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 27.3.2019 in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 142 of 2017 for the offence under Sections 272/273/308 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 30/38/41 of B.P. Excise Act 2016. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that the name of this petitioner was disclosed by co-accused, Amit Kumar and Radhe Shyam and also 70 litres of Mahua made liquor and 7.2 litres of country made liquor were seized. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that nothing was recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 27.3.2019. Considering the fact that nothing was recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29597 of 2019(2) dt.03-05-2019 2/2 the conscious possession of the petitioner, the court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge 2nd cum Spl. Judge, Excise, Siwan, in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 142 of 2017 subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be elected representative of the local body. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/mukeshU T