Chitranjan Kumar Nirala v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32737 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2022 Thana- FESHAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== CHITRANJAN KUMAR NIRALA S/o Rajendra Paswan R/o villageGhejana, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Vigilance Investigation Bureau, through Police Inspector Cum Investigation Officer, Vigilance Investigation Bureau Gaya Range, Patna, Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Adv Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP For the Vigilance :

Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Spl.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-09-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the Vigilance filed a counter affidavit in the court. Let the same be accepted and kept on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal code.

Allegedly, the petitioner got appointment on the post of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32737 of 2022(2) dt.15-09-2022 2/3 Panchayat teacher on the basis of forged certificates. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The B.E.T.E.T. marksheet and other relevant documents of the petitioner is genuine and at the the joining to the post of panchayat teacher, the competent authority has perused the record and found genuine. He further submits that the petitioner has already been removed from his services. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner has already been removed from the service, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in Fesar P.S.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32737 of 2022(2) dt.15-09-2022 3/3 Case No.09 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T