← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32950/2022bail granted

Amit Singh Rajput v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-16Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32950 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-948 Year-2021 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== AMIT SINGH RAJPUT S/o Abhikant Singh Rajput R/o village- Mathurapur Kabirchowk, Naka No. 6, P.S.- Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 16-09-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State, through Virtual Court Proceedings.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 948 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 29.10.2021.

The allegation against the petitioner is to make a preparation for commit dacoity and while making so, found in possession of one country made pistol along with other co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32950 of 2022(2) dt.16-09-2022 2/3 accused persons.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that nothing surfaced during course of investigation, which may suggest that this petitioner was under preparation to commit dacoity along with other co-accused persons. It is also submitted that prior to this occurrence, this petitioner was man of clean antecedent, as he subsequently named in one more criminal case. It is also submitted that false implication further get strength that seizure list is not supported by independent witnesses, rather supported by police personnel. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has already been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

Learned APP appearing for the State, opposed the prayer of bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as seizure list of alleged firearms appears doubtful on its face as not supported by independent witnesses coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 948 of 2021 on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32950 of 2022(2) dt.16-09-2022 3/3 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., 1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur concerned court, subject to the condition as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) S.Katyayan/- U T