Ram Pravesh Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16617 of 2017 ====================================================== Ram Pravesh Bhagat son of Late Ram Prasad Bhagat resident of Village - Narari Kala, P.O. - Saduri Karma, P.S. Narari Kala Khurd and District - Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

3.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad. 4.

The Circle Officer, Circle Nabinagar, Aurangabad. 5.

The Chief Executive Officer, Nabinagar Power Generating Company (A.J.V. of State of Bihar and NTPC) site office Barun P.S.-Barun, Distt.-Aurangabad ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate :

Mr. Vyas Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Birendra Prasad Singh, AC to SC-19 For the Resp. No.5 :

Mr. Amaresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate :

Mr. Vaibhav Narayan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the concerned Respondent to make payment of compensation with all other statutory benefits with statutory interest till the date of realization for the Land of the petitioners acquired for construction of the Nabinagar Power Generating Company for the homestead

Patna High Court CWJC No.16617 of 2017(3) dt.02-12-2025 2/2 land that has not being paid in spite of preparation of list of the displaced persons."

3. Mr. Verma, has taken this Court to Annexure-4 to show that before the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad in Misc. Case No. 68 of 2017 (Ram Pravesh Bhagat vs. The State of Bihar) was pending till the filing of the writ petition.

4. He submits that the heirs be allowed to contest the said case, if it is pending.

5. Since, there is no affidavit on behalf of the State, the present status is not known.

6. Granting said liberty as submitted by Mr. Verma, the writ petition is disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U