← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4952/2016withdrawn

Janardan Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-09Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4952 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Janardan Prasad Singh, son of Late Yamuna Prasad Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Ayodhyapuri Kokar, Road No.6 Ranchi 843009, P.O. Bariyatu, P.S.- Sadar, District- Ranchi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

4. The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

5. The Finance Officer, Lalit Narayan Mithila Univesity, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

6. The Finance Auditor, Bihar Government Camp, Lalit Narayan Mithila Univesity, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

7. The Pension Officer, Lalit Narayan Mithila Univesity, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

8. The Principal, Dr. L.K.V.D. College, Tajpur, Samastipur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jai Shankar Barnwal- Ga5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 09-05-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to approach the respondent University for redressal of his grievance in the mater of payment of admitted dues.

The Court grants him liberty to file representation before the University for redresal of his grievance and the Vice-Chancellor is expected to decide the representation and redress the grievance of

Patna High Court CWJC No.4952 of 2016 (3) dt.09-05-2018 2/2 the petitioner with regard to Earned Leave, Group Insurance, and difference of salary expeditiously. The respondent will decide the claim in accordance with law.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the claim of the petitioner.

With the aforesaid, this writ application is disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sanjeev/- U