Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31332/2025allowed

Vikky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-21Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31332 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vikky Kumar, Son of Arvind Das, Resident of Village - Mahua Singhrai, P.S.- Mahua, District - Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shanti Bhushan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-05-2025 Heard Mr. Shanti Bhushan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 41 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(5) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was apprehended with a bike. He could not show the documents of the bike and it is also alleged that the petitioner himself stated before the police that the bike was stolen.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31332 of 2025(2) dt.21-05-2025 2/2 case. From perusal of the seizure list, it will transpire that the seizure was made on 02.02.2025 at 21.50 O' clock and the F.I.R. was lodged on 03.02.2025 means seizure was done before filing of the F.I.R. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases that is why he has been framed in this case. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 03.02.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. 1st, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 41 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T