Ravi Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32588 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2025 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ravi Mukhiya, S/o Ram Pravesh Mukhiya, R/o Nanhakar, ward no. 15A, P.s.- Yogapatti, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No. 339 of 2025 dated 14.08.2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 115(2), 109(1), 76, 351(2), 352, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted with farsa on the head of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that from the perusal of the F.I.R., it appears that informant's husband had given Rs. 2.33 lakhs to his agnates, namely, Deba Mukhiya and Rajesh Mukhiya for execution of the sale deed but they did not execute the sale deed. Thereafter, the informant filed Title Suit against them. When the notices were received by the said agnates, they came along with other accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32588 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 2/2 persons including the petitioner and the petitioner is said to have assaulted with farsa on the head of the informant due to which she sustained injury. It is further submitted that from perusal of the injury report, it appears that one lacerated wound on temporal region of size 3''x 1/3'' x 1⁄4'' was found which is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance which does not support the case of the prosecution. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No. 339 of 2025, he shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.-Ist Class, Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S..
(Khatim Reza, J) prabhat/- U T