Awadhesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32228 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-317 Year-2019 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== AWADHESH RAI Son of Ramji Rai Resident of Village - Chhotka Brahmpur, Satgharwa, P.S. - Bhagwan Bazar, District - Saran at Chhapra. ... ... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Yashraj Bardhan, Advocate.
For the State :
Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State, through Video Conferencing. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No.317 of 2019 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Sri Pramod Ranjan, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Saran at Chhapra.
The accusation is that on 15.10.2019 at about 01.00 P.M., Vikrama Rai, the father of the informant Munna Rai, had gone to Deoria with his Thela (trolley) from Chhapra. When the father of the informant proceeded for Chhapra from Deoria and reached near Deoria, then 7 persons, named in the F.I.R., including the petitioner stopped the father of the informant and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32228 of 2020(3) dt.26-04-2021 2/3 some of them including the petitioner caught hold of him. In the meantime, Pampi Rai alias Babloo Rai opened fire from his Katta, which hit the left side of waist of the father of the informant, due to which the father of the informant fell down there sustaining injury. The father of the informant was rushed to Sadar Hospital Chhapra for treatment from where he was referred to Patna but he died in the way, while he was being taken to Patna.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that, in fact, the informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence and no specific overt act is attributed to the petitioner. The occurrence appears to be taken place in the way where the deceased, the father of the informant, was caught hold by the F.I.R. named accused including the petitioner and, thereafter, one of the co-accused, namely, Pampi Rai alias Babloo Rai shot fire at him.
Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, the petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32228 of 2020(3) dt.26-04-2021 3/3 directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T