Most. Dhano Devi And ORS v. Vinay Prasad Verma And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL REVISION No.149 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.
Most. Dhano Devi, Wife of Late Vijay Prasad Verma. 2.
Anil Kumar Verma 3.
Ranjit Kumar Verma @ Ranjit Kumar 4.
Sanjit Kumar Verma 5.
Niranjan Kumar Verma @ Niranjan Kumar All are sons of Late Vijay Prasad Verma, resident of Village- Purani Kachahri Katra, P.S.- Bihar, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Vinay Prasad Verma, Son of Late Babulal Prasad Verma 2.
Pappu Prasad Verma 3.
Dhiraj Kumar Verma Both are sons of Vinay Kumar Verma, All are the resident of VillageMurarpur, P.S.- Laheri, District- Nalanda. ................... Opposite Party 1st Set 4.
Uday Prasad Verma, Son of Late Babulal Prasad Verma 5.
Manoj Kumar Verma 6.
Pramod Kumar Verma 7.
Subodh Kumar Verma, All are sons of Uday Prasad Verma 8.
Smt. Shakuntala Devi, Wife of Vinay Prasad Verma 9.
Smt. Kunti Devi, Wife of Uday Prasad Verma, All are the resident of Village- Murarpur, P.S.- Laheri, District- Nalanda. ... ...Opposite Party 2nd Set / Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2026 As per the office notes dated 17.06.2026, requisites of notices have not been filed by learned counsel for the petitioners as per Court's order dated 16.03.2026.
2. On perusal of the records, it appears that this Civil Revision is of the year 2017 and the petitioners had absented on
Patna High Court C.R. No.149 of 2017(9) dt.22-06-2026 2/2 23.04.2026 and even today, on repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners for not complying with the Court's order dated 16.03.2026, so in view of the above facts, this Civil Revision is dismissed for default for non compliance of the Court's order dated 16.03.2026.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr.
U