← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1796/2019disposed

Saroj Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-05Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1796 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.566 of 2015 ====================================================== Saroj Devi W/o Late Chandra Shekhar Jha Resident of village - Bhakdari, Police Station Aren, District - Madhubani, presently posted as Gram sevika Harlakhi Block, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Mr. Arvind Kumar Chaudhary the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

Mr. Arvind Kumar Chaudhary The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

Mr. S. Siddharth The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

Mr. Shirsat Kapil Ashok The District Magistrate, Madhubani 5.

Mr. D.N. Jha The Additional District Magistrate (Establishment) , Madhubani 6.

Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh The District Magistrate, Samastipur 7.

Mr. Binay Kumar Rai The Additional District Magistrate (Establishment) , Samastipur 8.

Mr. Ajay Kumar The Deputy Development Commissioner, Madhubani 9.

Mr. Barun Kumar Mishra The Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vasant Vikas, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, AC to GA-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 05-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 19.03.2018

Patna High Court MJC No.1796 of 2019(2) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 passed in CWJC No. 566 of 2015."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner has been negated and as such, liberty be granted to challenge the same.

4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U