← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31258/2020bail granted

Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-12-02Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31258 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-267 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== ANIL KUMAR, aged about 26 years (Male), Son of Rambali Mahto, R/o Lalbandi, Ward No.10, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Harendra Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-12-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 468 liters wine is said to have been recovered from possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31258 of 2020(2) dt.02-12-2020 2/2 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 10.07.2020 and has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet/prosecution report has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 468 liters wine is recovered from possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Sitamarhi, in connection with Complaint Case No. C2267 of 2020. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T