← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/705/2023dismissed

Shubham Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-29Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.705 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13634 of 2022 ====================================================== Shubham Kumari, D/o Shri Shashi Nath Pandey, Wife of Vikash Kumar, R/o Mohalla-Chankyapuri, Road No. -3, House No.-208, M.I.T. Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur, PIN-842003, Bihar.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Home Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Chairman, Bihar Police Subordinate Service Commission, Patna. 3.

The Secretary, Bihar Police Subordinate Service Commission, Patna. 4.

The Special Executive Officer, Bihar Police Subordinate Service Commission, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Dr. Mahtab Ahmad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 29-01-2025 We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The appellant was unsuccessful in the recruitment of Sub-Inspectors and Police Sargents for which an advertisement, bearing No. 3 of 2020, was issued and the results were published on 14.07.2022.

3. The claim of the appellant is that she deserved more marks than other successful candidates.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.705 of 2023(2) dt.29-01-2025 2/2

4. The learned Single Judge, on finding such claim to be absolutely frivolous and based on no material, rightly rejected such claim by holding that the appellant was caring for a re-verification or re-evaluation of the answer-sheets, which is impermissible.

5. There is no merit in this petition and is, therefore, dismissed.

6. We have purposely restrained ourselves from imposing any costs on the appellant for the reason that she is still not in employment.

(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) manoj/Praveen-II U