Vijay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32480 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2022 Thana- FESHAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== VIJAY KUMAR SINGH Son of Bhim Singh Resident of Village - Dhanahi, P.S.- Aurangabad (Muffasil), Distt.- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
The Vigilance Investigation Bureau Through Police Inspector Cum Investigation officer Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Gaya Range, Patna., Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajay Mishra, A.P.P.
Mr. Arvind Kumar, Spl. P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned Spl. P.P for the Vigilance. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner secured appointment as Panchayat teacher based on forged mark sheet of BETET.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case based on an ex-parte inquiry conducted behind his back, it is next
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32480 of 2022(2) dt.23-11-2022 2/2 submitted that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner to explain his side of the case, perhaps the present F.I.R would not have been registered.
Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned Spl. P.P. oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Feshar P.S. Case No. 16 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T