Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39279 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2022 Thana- LAURIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Sah son of Sukhdev Sah VILLAGE- MISHR TOLA LAURIYA, POLICE STATION- LAURIYA, DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sarvesh Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 342, 386, 436, 406, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is alleged that the petitioner alongwith coaccused persons set the house of the informant on fire.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including petitioner and no specific allegation of overt act has been alleged against the petitioner. He further submits that after thorough investigation, police submitted final form on 26.04.2022 and petitioner was not sent up for trial, however

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39279 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 2/2 differing with final form, submitted by the police, the learned Court below took cognizance against all the three accused persons. As a matter of fact, a partition suit i.e. Partition Suit No. 249 of 2006 is pending between the parties in the Court of learned Sub Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran and only with a view to put pressure on petitioner's side, this false and concocted case has been lodged.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case No. 58 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Neha/- U T