Sundari Devi, v. The Punjab National Bank

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.373 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12122 of 2015 ====================================================== Sundari Devi, W/o Late Baldeo Singh, Resident of Village Bhataura, P.S.- Taraiya, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The Punjab National Bank through the Managing Director of Punjab National Bank, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi. 2.

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Punjab National Bank, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi.

3.

The Zonal Manager, Punjab National Bank, having its Zonal Office at R. Block, Patna.

4.

The Regional Manager, Punjab National Bank, having his office at Aghoria Bazar Chak Mandal, Muzaffarpur.

5.

The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Murlipur, Taraiya, Saran, Chapra.

6.

Nand Kishore Singh, Son of Late Ram Balan Singh, The President of Baba Education and Charitable Trust, at Yogiraj Deoraha Baldeo Singh Mahavidayalaya, Benipur Nagar, Taraiya, Saran. 7.

Devendra Singh, son of Late Ramjee Singh, Principal Incharge - CumSecretary of the Yogiraj Deoraha Baldeo Singh Mahavidayalaya, Benipuri Nagar, Taraiya, Saran.

8.

Sri Prabhu Nath Singh, Son of Late Paras Nath Singh, Secretary, Deoraha Baba Education and Charitable Trust, at Yogiraj Deoraha Baldeo Singh Mahavidayalaya, Benipuri Nagar, Taraiya, Saran. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandip Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 For the Bank :

Mr. Mahesh Narayan Parbat, Senior Advocate Mr. Ved Prakash Srivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-01-2020 Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.373 of 2017(5) dt.22-01-2020 2/3 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that other side has obtained the order from this Court without bringing the letter dated 08.01.2014, in which the present petitioner- Sundari Devi, has been shown to the a member of the Trust.

3.

This Court, in the opinion, vide judgment dated 16.02.2017 directed to ensure that the persons, who are working as Teachers and Staffs, must get the salary and the persons who are operating the Bank Account must be verified by the proper authority and the Bank will also ensure that money should be operated by proper persons and directed that those who are entitled to operate the Bank account, they will have to comply all the formalities asked by the Bank.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that they are not paying the money to the right persons. However, this was not the issue in the writ petitioner, hence, the same cannot be looked into in the present proceeding, inasmuch as, the petitioner is the Member of the Trust has filed this Review Petition, not a single teacher or staff has come forward and made complain that the salary has not been made to him. 5.

In such view of the matter, this Court does not find

Patna High Court C. REV. No.373 of 2017(5) dt.22-01-2020 3/3 any merit in this Review Petition, accordingly, the same is dismissed.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U