Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69148/2018disposed

Manish Kumar And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2026-02-02Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69148 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-593 Year-2011 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Manish Kumar son of Janardan Prasad Yadav 2.

Piyush Kumar @ Appu son of Janardan Prasad Yadav 3.

Janardan Yadav @ Janardan Prasad Yadav, son of Manik Lal Yadav All residents of Village- Srinagar, Police Station- Sahebpur Kamal, DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Madhu Kumari, wife of Manish Kumar, Daughter of Ashok Chaudhary, resident of Village- Ubrail, Police Station- K.Hat Maranga, District- Purnea, At present resident of Shivaji Colony, Sipahi Tola, in the house of Ram Murti Tiwari, Police Station- K.Hat, District- Purnea. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Sri Binod Kumar 3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-02-2026 This petition has been filed for quashing of order dated 02.06.2018 passed by learned S.D.J.M., Purnea in G.R. No.3435 of 2011, CIS No.3110 of 2013 arising out of K. Hat P.S. Case No.593 of 2011 under Sections 341, 323, 307, 406, 498A, 120B of the I.P.C. and Sections 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act by which the court concerned was pleased to reject the petition filed under Section 205 Cr.P.C. by the petitioners praying therein to dispense with their personal appearance during the trial subject to any condition.

2. From the report vide letter no.4950 dated 10th

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69148 of 2018(2) dt.02-02-2026 2/2 September, 2025 sent by learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Purnea, it appears that K. Hat P.S. Case No.593 of 2011 has already been disposed of and the accused persons have been convicted on 05.05.2025.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this case may be disposed of as it has become infructuous.

4. Learned APP for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners.

5. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T