Md. Hashim Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15674 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Hashim Ansari Son of Md. Mokhtar Ansari, Resident of Village Jahangirpur, Ansari Tola, Police Station Shyampur Bhathahan, DistrictSheohar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Jan Shiksha, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

5. The District Magistrate, Sheohar.

6. The District Education Officer, Sheohar.

7. The District Programme Officer (Literacy),Sheohar.

8. The District Pragramme Officer, Sheohar.

9. The Block Education Officer, Dumri Katsari Block, District Sheohar. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Smt. Shilpa Singh- GA12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2018 Heard the parties.

Following relief has been sought for in the present writ application on behalf of the petitioner:

"(a) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders or direction/directions in the nature of mandamus seeking direction to respondent authorities to accept the joining of the petitioner as Shiksha Swayam Sewak at Talimi Markaj centre in Government Primary School, Urdu Ansari Tola, Jahangirpur in Dumri Katsari block, districtSheohar after approving his appointment

Patna High Court CWJC No.15674 of 2016 (3) dt.09-08-2018 made by the concerned Selection/Monitoring Committee in the year 2014 itself in terms of guidelines.

On behalf of the petitioner it has been submitted that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the order dated 12-102017 passed in CWJC No. 16149 of 2016. The District Education Officer, Sheohar (respondent No. 6) is directed to examine the case of the petitioner in the light of the order referred above and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V./- U