Vijay Chauhan @ Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31667 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2020 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Vijay Chauhan @ Vijay Kumar, male, aged about 25 years, Son of Late Gorelal Chauhan Resident of Village- Bahri Bigha, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Nawada.

2.

Manoj Chauhan, male, aged about 28 years, Son of Yadu Chauhan Resident of Village- Bahri Bigha, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Nawada. 3.

Subodh Chauhan, male, aged about 34 years, Son of Chamari Chauhan @ Ram Tahal Chauhan Resident of Village- Bahri Bigha, Police StationMuffasil, District- Nawada. 4.

Ranjeet Chauhan, male, aged about 36 years, Son of Chamari Chauhan @ Ram Tahal Chauhan Resident of Village- Bahri Bigha, Police StationMuffasil, District- Nawada. 5.

Condu Chauhan @ Gendu Chauhan @ Gautam Chauhan, male, aged about 27 years, Son of Ramchandra Chauhan Resident of Village- Bahri Bigha, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 08-02-2021 The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Sucheta Yadav, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.

3. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Musffasil PS Case No. 59 of 2020 dated 10.03.2020, instituted under Sections 341/323/354/307/379/504/506/448/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31667 of 2020 dt.08-02-2021 2/2 Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

4. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the parties have compromised the matter and a petition has also been filed before the Court below. Thus, it was submitted that the matter be disposed off with liberty to the petitioners to surrender before the Court below and pray for bail, especially in light of such compromise having been entered into and filed before the Court below.

5. In view thereof, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioners, the application stands disposed off with liberty aforesaid.

6. If the petitioners surrender before the Court below and pray for bail within four weeks from today, the same shall be considered on its own merits, in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by the present order.

7. It shall be open to the petitioners to raise all points available to them, including that of compromise being entered into between the parties.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U T