← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33352/2022bail granted

Manjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-02Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33352 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2022 Thana- BARURAJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== MANJAY KUMAR Son of Lalbabu Ray Resident of Village - Manpur, P.S.- Vaishali, Distt.- Vaishali, State- Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nachiketa Jha,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State in the virtual Court proceeding. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 397, 398, 400, 414, 353, 307, 120B/34 of the IPC and Sections 25(1-b)a,26,27,35 of Arms Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submits that the allegation as alleged in the FIR that the accused persons fired on the police party whereupon the police also fired upon the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33352 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 2/3 accused persons. Further submits that it appears from the FIR as well as seizure list that two live cartridges have been recovered from possession of the petitioner and no arms an ammunition has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and the petitioner is not involved in the firing with the police and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 24.01.2022. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with G.R.No.201 of 2022, Baruraj P.S. Case No.14 of 2022, with the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33352 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 3/3 witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T