Shiv Sagar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32745 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2021 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Shiv Sagar Rai Son Of Late Chet Naraian Rai Resident Of Village - Terasia, Ward No.14, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Distt.- Vaishali. 2.

Vinod Rai @ Nanak Rai @ Vinod Kumar Rai Son Of Ram Nand Rai Resident Of Village - Terasia, Ward No.14, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, Distt.- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 33755 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2021 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Dharmendra Rai Son Of Shiv Sagar Rai R/O- Terasia, Ward No.-14, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 32745 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Veena Rani Prasad (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 33755 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32745 of 2022(2) dt.09-09-2022 2/2 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a)/30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioners rather 200 liters of country made liquor, 4 pieces of Aluminium Pipe and 2000 liter Raw Java are said to have recovered from the place of occurrence. He further submits that petitioners have criminal antecedent of similar nature as stated in para-3 of the bail application. Considering the facts that the petitioners are involved in manufacturing and selling of illegal liquor, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 240 of 2021.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T