Anjum Praveen v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41952 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2018 Thana- KALER District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Anjum Praveen, W/O Haidar Khan @ Md. Haidar Khan, Resident of VillagePooza Kothi, (Fatehabad), P.O. Belaon, P.S.- Kaler, District- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kaler P.S. Case No.21 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 468, 467, 471 and 120B of IPC. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected twice, firstly, vide order dated 31.07.2018 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 44600 of 2018 and again vide order dated 12.12.2018 passed in Criminal Misc. No.68558 of 2018.
Petitioner happens to be the agent of Indus Weir Industries Ltd. and the allegation is that informant has deposited fixed amount of Rs.15000/- and from 31st July, 2012, he deposited Rs.200/- for three years and other villagers also deposited heavy amount in the said company and the said company fled away in the year 2017 and as such, the petitioner has defalcated the money of several persons including the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41952 of 2019(2) dt.11-07-2019 2/2 informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the meantime, another accused has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.02.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 4512 of 2019.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides, since the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected twice and she was directed to surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, but she has not surrendered waited for a long time, now she is making submission that another accused has already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail, as such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. With the above observations, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T