Mukesh Prasad @ Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42069 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-485 Year-2020 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== MUKESH PRASAD @ MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH KUMAR PRASAD S/O RAMAVATAR MAHTO R/O VILLAGE-HARDIYA, P.SBETTIAH, DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhurendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 18-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 485 of 2020 registered under Section 302/34 of the I.P.C.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Further he submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that petitioner is named in the first information report. There is direct involvement of the petitioner in the alleged occurrence. Hence,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42069 of 2021(4) dt.18-04-2022 2/2 he does not deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected.

shailendra/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T