Binod Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2325 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18156 of 2015 ====================================================== Binod Kumar Singh Son of Late Rambriksh Yadav, Resident of MohallaReferal Hospital Road, Forbisganj, Ward No. 7, Police Station- Forbisganj, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar and Ors

2. Himanshu Sharma, the District Magistrate, Araria son of not known to the petitioner.

3. Vijay Kumar, Block Development Officer, Forbisganj, Araria son of not known to the petitioner.

4. The Nagar Parishad, Araria, through its Executive Officer.

5. Suman Kumar, the Executive Officer Nagar Parishad, Forbisganj, Araria. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Prasad Sinha - AAG 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 30-01-2019 The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Forbesganj to consider the grievance of the petitioner for payment of pay and allowances for suspension period on revocation of the suspension and disposed of the same within 6 weeks of receipt/production of a copy of the order. On contempt application being filed that a show cause has been filed by the Executive Officer enclosing an order dated 12.01.2019 whereby payment has been made for suspension period but which according to Mr. Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, is not substantial compliance. In my opinion once the claim has

Patna High Court MJC No.2325 of 2017(4) dt.30-01-2019 2/2 been considered and disposed of by the order impugned whereby some payments have been made towards the pay and allowances for the suspension period which part thereof has been denied and the reasons therefor is assigned in the order, the proper course for the petitioner would be to question this order in an appropriate proceeding which he may do if so advised. No cause for contempt is made out.

The contempt application is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U