Daroga Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29991 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2019 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

DAROGA ANSARI Son of Ganhur Ansari, Resident of Village - Patkhauli, P.S.- Kateya, Distt - Gopalganj.

2.

Anwar Ansari Son of Ganhur Ansari, Resident of Village - Patkhauli, P.S.- Kateya, Distt - Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Naresh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 72 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 379, 354B and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. On account of land dispute, the accused persons tried to strangulate the informant by tying rope around her neck and dragged her on that account she became naked. On raising alarm, her son came to rescue her, but he was also assaulted. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the court below has examined the case diary, having not found

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29991 of 2019(2) dt.07-05-2019 2/2 any injury report.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 72 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) mkchy/- U T