Rajendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31612 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2018 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAJENDRA SINGH Son of Jabbar Singh Resident of Village- Sarebari, P.S.- Amedh, District- Rajsabhd (Rajsthan).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Chakia P.S. Case No. 101/2018, instituted for offence under Sections 30, 50(g), 57 and 60 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Earlier prayer for bail of petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 05.11.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66606/2018 with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after six months.

Report from the court below regarding stage of trial has been received, from which it appears that charge has not been framed in this case till date.

As per written report, 4500 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from the truck. Petitioner was co-driver of the said truck along with one Raj Kumar.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31612 of 2019(3) dt.19-06-2019 2/2 Petitioner is in custody since 25.05.2018.

Keeping in view the period of custody spent by petitioner, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 101/2018, subject to the conditions that, (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T