Sanjeev Kumar Besra v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3668 of 2015 ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar Besra Son of Sri Guru Besra, resident of Village- Kajara Kawaiya, Near Kajara Ghat, P.O.- Rangpura South, P.S.- Meerganj, Dhamdaha, District- Purnea Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary 2.
The District Magistrate, Purnea.
3.
The Superintendent of Police, Purnea.
4.
The Sub- Divisional Officer, Dhamdaha, Purnea. 5.
The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Dhamdaha, District- Purnea. 6.
The circle Officer, Dhamdaha, District- Purnea. 7.
The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Rangpura South, P.S.-Meeraganj, Dhamdaha, District- Purnea Bihar.
8.
Miththu Soren, Son of Late Durga Soren.
9.
Babbu Soren , Son of Sri Miththu Soren. Sl. No. 8 and 9 are resident of Village- Kajara Kawaiya, Near Kajara ghat, P.O.- Rangpura South, P.S.- Meeraganj, Dhamdaha, District- Purnea Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Prashant Pratap, GP-2s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 01-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, though learned counsel AC to GP-2 is present.
2. Heard the parties.
3. The present petition has been preferred for :- "That this writ application is being filed for issue writ/writs, order/orders direction/directions upon the respondents for the rectification of mistake in full where the petitioner has suffered due to an act of
Patna High Court CWJC No.3668 of 2015(3) dt.01-07-2025 2/2 compensation the court and in for the the matter involving infringement or deprivation of fundamental rights, abuse of process of law, harassment etc. to an aggrieved petitioner for not only to remedy wrong done to him but also to serve as a deterrent for wrong doers who has violated the fundamental rights V/A-21 of Constitution of India as per citation in 2012 (9) SCC 791-C are well established and Right to property is now considered to be not a constitutional or a statutory right but also a human right as per rule cited in 2013 (1) SCC 353 & practice to prolong the proceedings needs to be strongly discouraged as per binding order cited in AIR 1985 SC 330."
4. Since there is no appearance, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Saurav/- U