← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32217/2025bail granted

Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-19Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32217 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2025 Thana- MOHANPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Son of Hari Yadav Resident of Village - Simra, P.S.- Mohanpur, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 309 (4) of the B.N.S.

3. The F.I.R. discloses that three unknown miscreants are said to have taken away the motorcycle of the informant by pushing him down.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that first information report has been lodged against unknown and the name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the confessional statement of co-accused, Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Paswan. It would further appear from the bail rejection order itself that the of the motorcycle in question has been recovered from the said Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32217 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 2/2 Paswan. As a matter of fact, there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner has also not been put on test identification parade. It is further pointed out that the chargesheet has been submitted. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since 27.02.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that the F.I.R. is against unknown and the petitioner has been made accused upon the confessional statement of co-accused, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No.61 of 2025.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) Trivedi/- U T